MODULATION OF EFFECTS AND FISCAL WAR: ANALYSIS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT’S CASE LAW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46801/2595-6280-rdta-45-29Keywords:
FEDERAL SUPREME COURT, TAX LAW, FISCAL WAR, ICMSAbstract
This article aims to analyze the appliance of the modulation of effects mechanism by the Federal Supreme Court within concentrated control of constitucionality decisions of bills or normative acts that imply tax concessions related to Tax of Sales and Services (ICMS) related to the fiscal war phenomenon. Over this article we attempted to critically analyze the Court’s case law to identify which criteria were used by the Federal Supreme Court Judges to apply the mechanism, if it is possible to determine that the mechanism has been used as an exception or as a rule, as well as if it is possible to identify, from the case law analysis, Federal Supreme Court Judges with greater or less tendency to apply the mechanism within the Court’s concentrated control of constitucionality decisions of bills or normative acts that imply tax concessions related to Tax of Sales and Services (ICMS) related to the fiscal war phenomenon.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Roberto Quiroga Mosquera, Amanda de Oliveira Valdo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
O autor (ou coautor) declara que o artigo submetido à avaliação, que segue em anexo, é de sua autoria, e inédito, comprometendo-se a não publicar este artigo em qualquer outro meio, impresso ou digital, mantendo a exclusividade para a Revista Direito Tributário Internacional Atual, cedendo, em caso de aprovação do trabalho, os direitos autorais à Revista para fins de publicação do trabalho nesta edição.