THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF VEHICLE SEIZURE AS AN INDIRECT WAY OF CHARGING IPVA IN THE STATE OF GOIÁS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46801/2595-6280-rdta-45-3Keywords:
UNCONSTITUTIONALITY, SEIZURE OF VEHICLE, DEFAULT, IPVA, GOIAS STATEAbstract
This scientific article seeks, in a bibliographic and documentary perspective, to discuss the constitutionality of the seizure of the vehicle owed to the Motor Vehicle Property Tax1 as an indirect form of collection, which is commonplace in the State of Goias. It analyzes the way in which vehicles are licensed in the State, the default of IPVA and the consequences of arrears will be analyzed, addressing Law 6.830/80 that regulates the form of collection of taxes and whether the conduct adopted by the police in relation to the seizure of the unlicensed vehicle, due to the failure to pay the tax, it violates constitutional rights. Still, it analyzes the principles of due legal process, broad defense and non-confiscation that seeks to safeguard the fundamental rights of the citizen in the face of the State’s action. Given this perspective, studies were carried out seeking acceptance in decisions of the Court of Justice of the State of Goias, of the superior courts, in addition to doctrines of renowned jurists and, mainly, the study of the Federal Constitution, National and State Tax Codes and Brazilian Traffic.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ana Carolina de Freitas Inácio, Rafael Machado de Souza

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
O autor (ou coautor) declara que o artigo submetido à avaliação, que segue em anexo, é de sua autoria, e inédito, comprometendo-se a não publicar este artigo em qualquer outro meio, impresso ou digital, mantendo a exclusividade para a Revista Direito Tributário Internacional Atual, cedendo, em caso de aprovação do trabalho, os direitos autorais à Revista para fins de publicação do trabalho nesta edição.